继3月3日之后， 《环球时报》（Global Times）于3月11日再次发表我院程虹教授文章“Divergence seen in Chinese companies' development”，本文提出中国经济形势处于大分化，并具体从企业绩效、企业盈利模式、企业要素资源、企业进入与退出和企业创新能力等五个方面具体分析了中国经济大分化的主要表现。

3月3日刊发程虹文章题为“Entrepreneurial spirit needs to adapt to modern era”，该文具体分析了中国经济的最大隐忧在于企业家精神的下滑，如想了解该文详细内容，请点击www.iqds.whu.edu.cn/info/1200/12727.htm查看。

《环球时报》（Global Times）是由中国共产党中央委员会机关报社人民日报社主办与出版的国际新闻类小报，创刊于1993年1月。2009年4月20日，《环球时报》英文版创刊，成为中国第二份面向全国发行的英语综合性报纸，也是唯一向国外传达符合中国基本国情综合新闻的一份报媒。《环球时报》拥有200万左右的的发行量，以及10万余份的航空赠报。

据悉，《环球时报》先后被评为“全国被转载率最高的十佳报纸”、“北京地区读者最喜爱的十大报纸”、“辽沈地区最受读者喜爱的十佳报刊”。2014年，被世界品牌实验室和世界经济论坛评为“2004年中国500最具价值品牌”。同年被中国国际航空公司评为“飞机上最受读者欢迎的报纸第一名”。2005年4月被“2005中国传媒投资年会”评为“第二届中国最具投资价值媒体报纸类第二名”。

现将“Divergence seen in Chinese companies' development”全文转载如下：

The Chinese economy has entered a significant and sensitive phase, and there are differing attitudes toward its future development.

The China Employer-Employee Survey (CEES) project I work for conducted field investigations among China's enterprises between 2012 and 2015 and collected nearly 6,000 questionnaire responses that comprehensively reflected the conditions in 570 Chinese enterprises, including profits, business operation, sales, technology, and salaries. Based on the research results, we came to the conclusion that China's economy shows a strong pattern of divergence.

The divergence means that enterprises that are an important part of China's micro economic health show two different traits. On the one hand, those that remain open despite poor business performance, namely "zombie enterprises," gradually exit from the market. On the other hand, firms that excel in innovation survive and prosper. Over the past three decades of reform and opening-up, Chinese firms have become polarized. Their business performance is no longer exactly in line with the overall economic cycle as in the past when almost all firms prospered along with sound macroeconomic fortunes, and suffered when the macro environment deteriorated. A fundamental change is that instead of passively accepting the economic cycle, some Chinese enterprises manage to weather adversity and succeed even in the same economic environment in which other firms are suffering.

The divergence among Chinese firms can be summarized in the following five aspects.

The first is divergence in business performance. From 2013 to 2014, the average profit margin of 80 percent of the 570 companies surveyed increased by 0.94 percentage points year-on-year, whereas 10 percent of the companies surveyed continuously recorded losses over the two years. Statistics have also shown the divergence between profit-generating companies and loss-making ones tends to widen.

The second is divergence in profit model. One category of enterprises makes profits by taking advantage of opportunities arising from fast growth in the country's GDP. Another category of enterprises is more focused on developing the companies' own abilities, in particular product quality, and is less dependent on the macro economic circumstances. In addition, regarding fluctuations in the economic situation such as regional GDP growth, enterprises that have built their own branding are less likely to be influenced by the macroeconomic environment than those that conduct contract manufacturing for other brands.

The third is divergence in utilizing resources. Currently, the increase in salaries has outpaced the improvement in productivity, so the cost advantage that certain companies used to get thanks to low labor costs is vanishing, making it hard for such companies to survive. But a different group of companies has chosen to enhance investment in human capital, replace unskilled labor with skilled workers, and enhance the contribution of total factor productivity to business performance.

The fourth is divergence in market entry and exit among different firms. According to the survey conducted in 2014, based on the time of a company's registration and indicators of business operation, among more than 700 companies, 17.6 percent failed and exited from the market. In terms of specific industries, the failure ratio in industries like ferrous metals was more than 40 percent, while the figure for the food manufacturing industry was only between 1 and 2 percent.

The last factor is divergence in innovation ability. Better-performing companies are usually the ones that have strong ability to innovate, which can be seen in their increased investment in R&D, and higher proportion of developers among total employees. Although greater research spending may not necessarily bring about better performance in the short run, it can help with increasing output eventually.

More importantly, the divergence among Chinese firms has changed China's economic growth model. It is obvious that enterprises' own ability to generate growth affects China's economic growth and pure macroeconomic policy stimulus won't necessarily boost a company's earnings. These changes will allow the market to play a deciding role, and can help the economy move away from the old-fashioned and unsustainable development model, and head toward one that is of higher quality and more market-based.

Facing such realities of the great divergence among Chinese firms, the economy may struggle to recover because resources are sometimes mismatched in the capital market and labor market, which can hinder innovation, and path dependence still results in inefficient institutional systems.

The Chinese economy is at a crossroad. The country must choose between a path that strives for better economic quality, or a path that blindly pursues economic growth. And whether the decision we make is wise or not can be tested in the reshaping of the country's entrepreneurial spirit and reform of the existing system.

原文地址：http://www.globaltimes.cn/content/973205.shtml

* 凡本网编辑上传的文章内容（注明转载文章除外），均为武汉大学质量发展战略研究院合法拥有版权或有权使用的作品，未经本网授权不得转载、摘编或利用其它方式使用上述作品。已经本网授权使用作品的，应在授权范围内使用，并注明“来源：武汉大学质量发展战略研究院”。违反上述声明者，本网将追究其相关法律责任。

如需转发本网文章，因作品内容、版权和其它问题需要同我们联系的，请在相关作品刊发之日起30日内进行。